Belle v. Chromalloy American Corp.

51 A.D.2d 933, 381 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11623
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1976·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on July 30, 1975, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondents. As conceded by appellant in his brief, Special Term had the statutory authorization and discretion to hold the motion in abeyance pending a reference to a Special Referee to whom the court referred certain questions, including whether one of the defendants was served in this defamation action. Appellant takes the position that considering all the information available to the court in the motion papers, the reference was an abuse of discretion. We do not agree. The facts are sharply controverted. The reference should be of valuable aid to the court to properly decide the matter. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belle v. Chromalloy American Corp., 51 A.D.2d 933, 381 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 933 (Belle v. Chromalloy American Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosen v. Rosen
16 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Gallant v. Gallant
197 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bernstein v. Freudman
180 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Martin-Trigona v. Waaler & Evans
148 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Barcelona Hotel, Ltd. v. Hadlow
82 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)