Belle Isle v. Kindig

103 S.E. 270, 25 Ga. App. 295, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 749
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1920
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 270 (Belle Isle v. Kindig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belle Isle v. Kindig, 103 S.E. 270, 25 Ga. App. 295, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 749 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

1. The court properly overruled the motion to dismiss the case as to the defendant Belle Isle.

2. There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. See Belle Isle v. Kindig, ante, 293.

3. No harmful error of law was committed, there was evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 270, 25 Ga. App. 295, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belle-isle-v-kindig-gactapp-1920.