Bellas v. Pardoe
15 A. 662, 2 Monag. 351, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 790
Opinion
A careful examination of this case satisfies us that the plaintiff in error has nothing of which he ought to complain.
The case was one principally of facts which, under proper instructions, were submitted to the jury. It follows that none of the assignments of error can be sustained.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bellas v. Pardoe, 15 A. 662, 2 Monag. 351, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 790 (Pa. 1888).
15 A. 662 (Bellas v. Pardoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Laform v. Bethlehem Township
499 A.2d 1373 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Ermentrout v. Stitzel
33 A. 109 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895)