Bellas, Hess & Co. v. Livingston

113 N.Y.S. 544
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 16, 1908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff seeks to appeal from an order of the Municipal Court granting a motion to vacate an attachment, but there is no power in this court to entertain such an appeal. Maas v. Nankeville, 49 Misc. Rep. 637, 97 N. Y. Supp. 980, and cases there cited.

The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bellas, Hess & Co. v. Livingston, 113 N.Y.S. 544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

113 N.Y.S. 544 (Bellas, Hess & Co. v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maas v. Nankeville
49 Misc. 637 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)