Bellamy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bellamy v. State

97 S.E. 276, 23 Ga. App. 19, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 15

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1918

Docket10045

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 276 (Bellamy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bellamy v. State, 97 S.E. 276, 23 Ga. App. 19, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Harwell, J.

1. In his motion for a continuance the defendant did not comply with all the requirements of the Penal Code (1910), § 987, necessary to make a complete showing, and, therefore, the court did not err in overruling , the motion.

2. The court correctly instructed the jury upon the theory of agency, raised by the defendant upon the trial, but the jury evidently rejected this theory and found the defendant to be the seller ’ of the whisky.

3. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, and, it having been approved by the trial judge, this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI