Bellamy v. State

267 So. 2d 374, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1972
DocketNo. 70-245
StatusPublished

This text of 267 So. 2d 374 (Bellamy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bellamy v. State, 267 So. 2d 374, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The point raised on appeal, which essentially questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction for aggravated assault, was not properly preserved for appellate review because the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence was not first submitted to the court by timely motion for new trial. State v. Owens, Fla. 1970, 233 So.2d 389. Were the question properly before us on the merits, the case of McCullers v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 206 So.2d 30 would require affirmance.

Reversible error not having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCullers v. State
206 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
State v. Owens
233 So. 2d 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 So. 2d 374, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellamy-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.