Bellamy v. Judges & Justices Authorized to Sit in the New York City Criminal Court & the New York State Supreme Court

New York Court of Appeals

Bellamy v. Judges & Justices Authorized to Sit in the New York City Criminal Court & the New York State Supreme Court

301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1101

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 3, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 N.E.2d 551 (Bellamy v. Judges & Justices Authorized to Sit in the New York City Criminal Court & the New York State Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bellamy v. Judges & Justices Authorized to Sit in the New York City Criminal Court & the New York State Supreme Court, 301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1101 (N.Y. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Plaintiffs argued that the New York State bail system deprived persons incarcerated before trial of equal protection and due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions and held there were no constitutional violations. [See 32 N Y 2d 886.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Plaintiffs argued that the New York State bail system deprived persons incarcerated before trial of equal protection and due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions and held there were no constitutional violations. [See 32 N Y 2d 886.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellamy-v-judges-justices-authorized-to-sit-in-the-new-york-city-ny-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack