Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 04-MAR-2026 08:26 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
ANTHONY BELLAMY, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; NICKOLAS T. HIRATA, Officer #1; DYLAN TORRES, Officer #2; BYRON MARFIL, Officer #3; and DIANA A.P. MIRANDA, Officer #4; in their individual capacities as Honolulu police officers, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nichols, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Petitioners’ Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed
on January 23, 2026, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 4, 2026.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Steven R. Nichols
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu (Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.