Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2026·No. SCWC-23-0000694·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 04-MAR-2026 08:26 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

ANTHONY BELLAMY, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; NICKOLAS T. HIRATA, Officer #1; DYLAN TORRES, Officer #2; BYRON MARFIL, Officer #3; and DIANA A.P. MIRANDA, Officer #4; in their individual capacities as Honolulu police officers, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nichols, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Petitioners’ Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed

on January 23, 2026, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 4, 2026.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Steven R. Nichols

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu, (haw 2026).

Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu (Bellamy v. City and County of Honolulu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.