Bellamy v. Bauknecht
This text of Bellamy v. Bauknecht (Bellamy v. Bauknecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7875
JAMES T. BELLAMY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DONALD BAUKNECHT, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:07-cv-02656-RBH)
Submitted: February 17, 2009 Decided: April 15, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James T. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James T. Bellamy, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bellamy v. Bauknecht, No.
6:07-cv-02656-RBH (D.S.C. July 11, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bellamy v. Bauknecht, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellamy-v-bauknecht-ca4-2009.