Home/Superior Court of Delaware/Bellah v. Hilles

Bellah v. Hilles

43 A. 89, 18 Del. 34, 2 Penne. 34, 1899 Del. LEXIS 6
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMarch 30, 1899
DocketForeign Attachment No. 134
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 43 A. 89 (Bellah v. Hilles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bellah v. Hilles, 43 A. 89, 18 Del. 34, 2 Penne. 34, 1899 Del. LEXIS 6 (Del. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

The Court

held that as foreign attachment was only to compel appearance and that as the defendant had appeared by putting in special bail, under the express terms of the statute, the case proceeded as in cases commenced by summons, and that the plaintiff [35]*35was therefore entitled to amend.

Waples and wife vs. McIlvaine’s Admr., 5 Harr., 381; McColley vs. Collins, 5 Harr., 391; Benjamin’s Executors vs. Boyce, 3 Harr., 315; Collins vs. Townsend, 2 Harr., 317.

Amendment allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canaday v. Superior Court
119 A.2d 347 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1955)
Brainard v. Canaday
112 A.2d 862 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1955)
John R. Hitchens, Inc. v. Phillips Packing Co.
42 Del. 393 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1943)
Hackett v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
165 A. 332 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1933)
Console Master Speaker Corp. v. Muskegon Wood Products Corp.
33 Del. 604 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1928)
Lutz v. Roberts Cotton Oil Co.
82 A. 601 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A. 89, 18 Del. 34, 2 Penne. 34, 1899 Del. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bellah-v-hilles-delsuperct-1899.