Bell, Vaughn Ray
Opinion
I agree with the court of appeals that it was constitutional error for the trial judge to order Appellant to be shackled during his trial. I disagree that this error was harmless. Unlawful and uncalled for shackling has a substantial effect on the jury's view of the defendant. The fact that a defendant is shackled without cause gives the jury the perception that he is a much more dangerous criminal and may prevent him from receiving a fair trial. Because we cannot determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to Appellant's conviction or punishment, I would hold that Appellant was harmed by the trial judge's error and would reverse the court of appeals. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
Filed: September 18, 2013
Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell, Vaughn Ray (Bell, Vaughn Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.