Bell, Vaughn Ray

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell, Vaughn Ray. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1321
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided September 18, 2013·No. PD-0087-12·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0087-12
VAUGHN RAY BELL, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

FANNIN COUNTY

Meyers, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION



I agree with the court of appeals that it was constitutional error for the trial judge to order Appellant to be shackled during his trial. I disagree that this error was harmless. Unlawful and uncalled for shackling has a substantial effect on the jury's view of the defendant. The fact that a defendant is shackled without cause gives the jury the perception that he is a much more dangerous criminal and may prevent him from receiving a fair trial. Because we cannot determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to Appellant's conviction or punishment, I would hold that Appellant was harmed by the trial judge's error and would reverse the court of appeals. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.



Filed: September 18, 2013

Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Vaughn Ray, (Tex. 2013).

Bell, Vaughn Ray (Bell, Vaughn Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.