Bell v. Wilson
52 Ark. 173
This text of 52 Ark. 173 (Bell v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Wilson, 52 Ark. 173 (Ark. 1889).
Opinion
Opinion on motion for reconsideration.
It is not ruled in this case, as counsel seems to suppose, that a subsequent creditor .or purchaser may not attack the deed of Moore as a fraud upon his rights. See Adams v.. Edgerton, 48 Ark., 41Q ; Driggs v. Norwood, go Ark., 42. It is only determined that the Allen decree was not evidence of" that fact in this suit.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-wilson-ark-1889.