Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bell v. Wilkinson

Bell v. Wilkinson

80 S.E. 694, 14 Ga. App. 321, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 247
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1914
Docket5346
StatusPublished

This text of 80 S.E. 694 (Bell v. Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Wilkinson, 80 S.E. 694, 14 Ga. App. 321, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 247 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Roan, J.

The evidence fully authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. August 20, 1913. . W. V. Custer, B. G. Hartsfield, for plaintiff in error. W. M. Harrell, John B. Wilson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 694, 14 Ga. App. 321, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-wilkinson-gactapp-1914.