Bell v. Wick Motor Sales, Inc.
This text of 29 A.D.2d 628 (Bell v. Wick Motor Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: It is conceded by all of the parties that the charge, relating to the City Ordinance [629]*629placing upon the property owner the duty to have the sidewalk in front of his property free of ice and snow by 9 o’clock in the morning, was erroneous. However, upon this record we find that this was not so prejudicial as to warrant a reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term dismissing complaint in negligence action.) Present — 'Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.2d 628, 285 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-wick-motor-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1967.