Bell v. Weyman & Connors

99 Ga. 273
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 27, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The declaration, as amended, made a ease entitling the plaintiff to equitable relief, and it was therefore error to dismiss it on demurrer. Judgment reversed.

By amendment be alleged, that on account of his poverty he is unable to tender the amount due defendants on the deed of December 13, 1892; and therefore prays that whatever the jury finds is due defendants for money loaned to him March 22, 1892, he found in their favor by the jury against him, and that defendants have all the equities they axe entitled to. The demurrer was on the grounds, that the petition is without equity; that plaintiff does not tender the sums admitted to be due; that he does not allege defendants to be insolvent, and is therefore not entitled to the relief prayed for. W. I. Heyward, for plaintiff. King & Anderson, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Weyman & Connors, 99 Ga. 273 (Ga. 1896).

99 Ga. 273 (Bell v. Weyman & Connors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Merck
57 S.E.2d 326 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Pope v. Thompson
122 S.E. 604 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Brown v. Bonds
54 S.E. 933 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)