Bell v. Western Union Tel. Co.
53 S.E. 177, 73 S.C. 208, 1906 S.C. LEXIS 166
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal from1 an order granting the defendant further time within which to answer the complaint:
The record fails to disclose any facts even tending to show an abuse of discretion on the part of his Honor, the presiding Judge. Therefore, the order is not appealable. McDaniel v. Addison, 53 S. C., 222, 31 S. E., 226.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. Western Union Tel. Co., 53 S.E. 177, 73 S.C. 208, 1906 S.C. LEXIS 166 (S.C. 1906).
53 S.E. 177 (Bell v. Western Union Tel. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDaniel v. Addison
31 S.E. 226 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1898)