Bell v. Wayne County General Hospital

456 F.2d 1062, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10735
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 1972
Docket17-3840
StatusPublished

This text of 456 F.2d 1062 (Bell v. Wayne County General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Wayne County General Hospital, 456 F.2d 1062, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10735 (6th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

456 F.2d 1062

Annette BELL, by her next friend, Dianne Rubin, individually
and on behalf of all persons alleged to be
mentally ill who are similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
WAYNE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL AT ELOISE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-1708.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

March 15, 1972.

Gabe Kaimowitz, Mich. Legal Service Assistance Program, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs-appellants; Joel D. Kellman, Mich. Legal Service Assistance Program, Detroit, Mich., on brief.

Stewart H. Freeman, Asst. Sol. Gen., Lansing, Mich., for defendants-appellees; Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, Mich., on brief.

Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial by a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan of petitioner's motion to convene a three-judge court. Appellant challenges the constitutionality of certain sections of Michigan Statutes dealing with the temporary detention of persons alleged to be mentally ill. She seeks permanently to enjoin the enforcement and operation of Michigan Statute Annotated 14.809(1) and 14.811 (1969), as amended, (Supp. 1971), M.C.L.A. Secs. 330.11a, 330.21, on the ground that under the terms of said statute she has been deprived of and is currently threatened with being deprived of due process of law.

Our inspection of these statutes, appellant's claim and the opinion of the District Judge denying relief convinces us that the complaint does allege facts which if accepted as true, represent claims of substantial federal constitutional violations. See Ex parte Poresky, 290 U.S. 30, 54 S.Ct. 3, 78 L.Ed. 152 (1933).

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded for the appointment of a three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 2281 and 2284 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Poresky
290 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Bell v. Wayne County General Hospital At Eloise
456 F.2d 1062 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 F.2d 1062, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-wayne-county-general-hospital-ca6-1972.