Bell v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
164 A.2d 288, 223 Md. 672
This text of 164 A.2d 288 (Bell v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 164 A.2d 288, 223 Md. 672 (Md. 1960).
Opinion
Judge Tucker’s opinion in the Criminal Court of Baltimore deals fully and adequately with all of the contentions of the applicant, a substantial part of which was adjudicated finally in Bell v. Warden, 218 Md. 666, 146 A. 2d 56. For the reasons stated by Judge Tucker for denying the relief sought, the application for leave to appeal is denied.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bell v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
146 A.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.2d 288, 223 Md. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1960.