Bell v. United States
This text of Bell v. United States (Bell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2208
THURSTON PAUL BELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; WALTER MATYCZYK, JR.; LEON K,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-03406-WDQ)
Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurston Paul Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Richard T. Morrison, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thurston Paul Bell appeals from the district court’s
orders: (1) denying his petition to quash a third-party record-
keeper summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, (2) ordering
enforcement of the summons, (3) denying his motions to disqualify
the district court judge, and (4) denying his motion for the court
to invalidate a judgment of a district court in Pennsylvania. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find
no abuse of discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. United
States, No. 1-06-cv-03406-WDQ (D. Md. filed July 11, 2007; entered
July 13, 2007 & October 2, 2007). We deny the United States’
motion for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bell v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-united-states-ca4-2008.