Bell v. Toothsavers, Inc.
764 N.E.2d 389, 97 N.Y.2d 674, 738 N.Y.S.2d 286, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3829
This text of 764 N.E.2d 389 (Bell v. Toothsavers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Toothsavers, Inc., 764 N.E.2d 389, 97 N.Y.2d 674, 738 N.Y.S.2d 286, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3829 (N.Y. 2001).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this action commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).
Judges Smith and Graffeo taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 5602
New York CVP § 5602
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 389, 97 N.Y.2d 674, 738 N.Y.S.2d 286, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-toothsavers-inc-ny-2001.