Bell v. Toothsavers, Inc.
699 N.E.2d 424, 92 N.Y.2d 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1473
This text of 699 N.E.2d 424 (Bell v. Toothsavers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Toothsavers, Inc., 699 N.E.2d 424, 92 N.Y.2d 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1473 (N.Y. 1998).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the [828]*828motion for leave to appeal from the nonfinal order of the Appellate Division entered in this action commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 5602
New York CVP § 5602
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
699 N.E.2d 424, 92 N.Y.2d 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-toothsavers-inc-ny-1998.