Bell v. Summerlin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bell v. Summerlin

4 S.E.2d 831, 188 Ga. 648, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 623

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 14, 1939

DocketNo. 12906

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.E.2d 831 (Bell v. Summerlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Summerlin, 4 S.E.2d 831, 188 Ga. 648, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 623 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

A deed conveyed a lot in the City of Sandersville to a named person “for and during her life, and at her death to be and become the property of such child or children as she may leave surviving her, descendants of children standing in place of their parents.” The municipality caused an adjacent street to be paved, and assessed the cost against the life-tenant and the property. The assessment was not paid, and the property was sold in virtue of an execution issued in like manner against the life-tenant and the property. Ga. L. 1927, p. 1517. In a suit afterwards brought by a vendee of the purchaser against a trustee for grandchildren of the life-tenant, for the purpose of quieting title, the case was submitted on the pleadings to the judge -without a jury; and it appearing therefrom that the facts were as indicated above, a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff. To this judgment the trustee excepted. Held:

[649]*649No. 12906. September 14, 1939. W. M. Goodwin., for plaintiff in error. J. E. Iiymm, contra.

1. Since the assessment and execution were issued against the life-tenant and the property, and not merely against the life-tenant, the sale included contingent interests of the grandchildren. Stokes v. State, 46 Ga. 412 (2) (12 Am. R. 588); Verdery v. Dotterer, 69 Ga. 194 (2); National Bank of Athens v. Danforth, 80 Ga. 55 (7 S. E. 546); Gross v. Taylor, 81 Ga. 86 (6 S. E. 179); Clower v. Fleming, 81 Ga. 247 (2) (7 S. E. 278); Roddenberry v. Simpson, 171 Ga. 715 (156 S. E. 583, 75 A. L. R. 414); Hopkins v. Chatham Phœnix National Bank & Trust Co., 174 Ga. 136 (162 S. E. 521); Kirk v. Bray, 181 Ga. 814 (184 S. E. 733); Paulk v. Ocilla, 188 Ga. 69 (2 S. E. 2d, 642) ; Howell v. Lawson, 188 Ga. 614 (3 S. E. 2d, 79); Pierce v. Wheeler, 53 Ga. App. 97 (185 S. E. 157).

2. Accordingly, the court did not err in rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and against the trustee defending solely in behalf of the grandchildren. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Justice.

A deed conveyed a lot in the City of Sandersville to a named person “for and during her life, and at her death to be and become the property of such child or children as she may leave surviving her, descendants of children standing in place of their parents.” The municipality caused an adjacent street to be paved, and assessed the cost against the life-tenant and the property. The assessment was not paid, and the property was sold in virtue of an execution issued in like manner against the life-tenant and the property. Ga. L. 1927, p. 1517. In a suit afterwards brought by a vendee of the purchaser against a trustee for grandchildren of the life-tenant, for the purpose of quieting title, the case was submitted on the pleadings to the judge -without a jury; and it appearing therefrom that the facts were as indicated above, a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff. To this judgment the trustee excepted. Held:

[649]*649No. 12906. September 14, 1939. W. M. Goodwin., for plaintiff in error. J. E. Iiymm, contra.

1. Since the assessment and execution were issued against the life-tenant and the property, and not merely against the life-tenant, the sale included contingent interests of the grandchildren. Stokes v. State, 46 Ga. 412 (2) (12 Am. R. 588); Verdery v. Dotterer, 69 Ga. 194 (2); National Bank of Athens v. Danforth, 80 Ga. 55 (7 S. E. 546); Gross v. Taylor, 81 Ga. 86 (6 S. E. 179); Clower v. Fleming, 81 Ga. 247 (2) (7 S. E. 278); Roddenberry v. Simpson, 171 Ga. 715 (156 S. E. 583, 75 A. L. R. 414); Hopkins v. Chatham Phœnix National Bank & Trust Co., 174 Ga. 136 (162 S. E. 521); Kirk v. Bray, 181 Ga. 814 (184 S. E. 733); Paulk v. Ocilla, 188 Ga. 69 (2 S. E. 2d, 642) ; Howell v. Lawson, 188 Ga. 614 (3 S. E. 2d, 79); Pierce v. Wheeler, 53 Ga. App. 97 (185 S. E. 157).

2. Accordingly, the court did not err in rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and against the trustee defending solely in behalf of the grandchildren. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.E.2d 831, 188 Ga. 648, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-summerlin-ga-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack