Bell v. State

15 S.W.2d 9, 111 Tex. Crim. 456, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 99
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 30, 1929
DocketNo. 12265.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 S.W.2d 9 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. State, 15 S.W.2d 9, 111 Tex. Crim. 456, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 99 (Tex. 1929).

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment a fine of twenty-five dollars and confinement in jail for thirty days.

The state’s attorney moves to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be granted. We note that the trial court ordered that appellant be brought into open court for the purpose of giving notice of appeal. The record fails to disclose that such notice was given and entered of record. Among other things, Article 827 C. C. P. provides :

“If notice of appeal is given at the term at which the conviction is had and the same is not entered of record, then by making proof of the fact, the judge of the court trying the cause shall order the same entered of record either in term time or vacation by entering in the minutes of his court an order to that effect. Said entry when so made shall bear date as of tiate when notice of appeal was actu"ally given in open court.”

If appellant in fact gave notice of appeal and same was not entered of record, he may avail himself of the provisions of the article above quoted in order that the trial court may direct that notice of appeal be entered of record. In the absence of such notice this court is without jurisdiction. Hughes v. State, 9 S. W. (2d) 1109.

We note that it is recited in appellant’s brief that appellant entered into recognizance on appeal. The recognizance is not brought forward in the record.

The appeal is dismissed. Appellant is granted fifteen days in which to perfect the record in the particulars mentioned.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hassell v. State
607 S.W.2d 529 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Clark v. State
218 S.W.2d 210 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Sheffield v. State
57 S.W.2d 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.W.2d 9, 111 Tex. Crim. 456, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.