Bell v. State

235 S.W. 887, 90 Tex. Crim. 400, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Tex. Crim. 342
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 7, 1921·No. No. 6528.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for perjury. Penalty two years imprisonment in penitentiary.

Motion to quash the indictment was made for the reason, among others, that there was a failure to aver that the alleged false statement was material to the matter under investigation. The indictment reveals the justness of the criticism, and the Assistant Attorney General confesses error under authority of Bell v. State, 75 Texas Crim. Rep., 401, 171 S. W. Rep., 239; Scott v. State, 75 Texas Crim. Rep., 396, 171 S. W. Rep., 243; Adamson v. State, 90 Texas Crim Rep., 221 (No. 6425, opinion delivered November 2, 1921, not yet reported) ; Highshaw v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 200 (opinion delivered October 26, 1921, not yet reported).

Judgment of the trial court is reversed, and prosecution ordered dismissed under the present indictment.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 235 S.W. 887, 90 Tex. Crim. 400, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161 (Tex. 1921).

235 S.W. 887 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
171 S.W. 239 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Scott v. State
171 S.W. 243 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Highsaw v. State
234 S.W. 220 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)