Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bell v. State

1930 OK CR 385, 295 P. 1119, 48 Okla. Crim. 258, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 29, 1930·No. No. A-7577.·Published

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of having *259 unlawful possession of one pint of whisky, and. his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

But one question is presented by the appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. From a careful examination of the record we find there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of having *259 unlawful possession of one pint of whisky, and. his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

But one question is presented by the appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. From a careful examination of the record we find there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Bell v. State, 1930 OK CR 385, 295 P. 1119, 48 Okla. Crim. 258, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 385 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.