Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bell v. State

1930 OK CR 385, 295 P. 1119, 48 Okla. Crim. 258, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 29, 1930

DocketNo. A-7577.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 385 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 1930 OK CR 385, 295 P. 1119, 48 Okla. Crim. 258, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of having *259 unlawful possession of one pint of whisky, and. his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

But one question is presented by the appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. From a careful examination of the record we find there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of having *259 unlawful possession of one pint of whisky, and. his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

But one question is presented by the appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. From a careful examination of the record we find there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 385, 295 P. 1119, 48 Okla. Crim. 258, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.