Bell v. State
776 S.W.2d 453, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1257, 1989 WL 102158
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Winston Bell, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely. Rule 24.035(Z). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[2] (Mo.banc 1989). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 776 S.W.2d 453, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1257, 1989 WL 102158 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
776 S.W.2d 453 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)