Bell v. State

46 Ind. 453
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 46 Ind. 453 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. State, 46 Ind. 453 (Ind. 1874).

Opinion

Downey, J.

The appellant, on affidavit and information filed against him in the circuit court, was charged with, and •convicted of, grand larceny. His motion to quash the affidavit and information and also a motion for a new trial were ■overruled.

The judgment must be reversed on two grounds:

i. The defendant could not be tried on an affidavit and [454]*454information filed in the circuit court. The State v. Justice. ante, p. 210.

2. The evidence, as set out in the bill of exceptions, does, not prove that the property alleged to have been stolen was. the property of the person named in the information. Jackson v. The State, 19 Ind. 312; Baker v. The State, 34 Ind. 104; Mullnix v. The State, 43 Ind. 511; King v. The State, 44 Ind. 285.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to quash the affidavit and information. The clerk will certify to the warden of the state prison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhoades v. State
70 N.E.2d 27 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1946)
Baker v. State
103 N.E. 268 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Culley v. State
138 N.E. 260 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1923)
People v. . Smith
114 N.E. 50 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Kruger v. State
35 N.E. 1019 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ind. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-ind-1874.