Bell v. State
96 S.E. 861, 148 Ga. 352, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 337
Opinion
1. Where a judge in the course of his instructions to the jury in the trial of one charged with the offense of murder charges them that before they will be authorized to convict they must be convinced by the evidence, beyond a-reasonable doubt, the failure to charge further upon the subject of reasonable doubt, or to define reasonable [353] doubt, is not cause for the grant of a new trial. Nelms v. State, 123 Ga. 575 (51 S. E. 588).
2. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 96 S.E. 861, 148 Ga. 352, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 337 (Ga. 1918).
96 S.E. 861 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. State
170 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Kersey v. State
61 S.E.2d 493 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Holmes v. State
22 S.E.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Wright v. State
190 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Snell v. State
175 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)