Bell v. State

137 So. 3d 550, 2014 WL 1373749, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5160
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6432
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2014·No. No. 4D13-3423·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jawan Bell seeks review of an order that summarily denied his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. His motion was timely filed within two years of his judgment and sentence. The trial court did not direct the state to respond to the motion, attach documents to refute the claim, or otherwise explain its denial. If the reason for the denial was because the motion was deemed insufficient for lack of a proper oath, the court must allow the defendant time to correct this defect. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2). We therefore reverse and remand for reconsideration under rule 3.850.

WARNER, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 137 So. 3d 550, 2014 WL 1373749, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

137 So. 3d 550 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.