Bell v. State

337 So. 2d 994, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 So. 2d 717
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1976·No. No. 75-1699·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter came before the court upon appellant’s motion for new trial due to inability to reconstruct trial transcript. The trial judge has filed a certificate stating that the court reporter’s notes of the trial have been lost or destroyed and are not available. The trial court has determined that it is impossible because of lapse of time to reconstruct the evidence in this case.

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the final judgment of conviction and sentence here under review be and the same is hereby set aside, and the appellant is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of being accorded a new trial. Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla.App.3rd, 1975).

WALDEN, C. J., ALDERMAN, J., and DAKAN, STEPHEN LEE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 337 So. 2d 994, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

337 So. 2d 994 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
308 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)