Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Bell v. State

191 So. 2d 49, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3335

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 19, 1966

DocketNo. 35010

StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 2d 49 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 191 So. 2d 49, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3335 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict does not appear. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict does not appear. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 So. 2d 49, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-fla-1966.