Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Bell v. State

198 So. 212, 144 Fla. 630, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1107

DecidedOctober 25, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 212 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 198 So. 212, 144 Fla. 630, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1107 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under information charging the defendant with robbery while not then and there being armed with a deadly weapon, the defendant was convicted and has perfected his appeal from such conviction to this Court.

The appellant has propounded in his brief ten (10) questions for our consideration.

We have carefully considered the record in the light of the questions propounded and find that no useful purpose can be served by the writing of an opinion. No reversible error is disclosed by the record.

The judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J-. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI