Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern

Ohio Supreme Court

Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern

195 N.E. 867, 129 Ohio St. 463, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463, 2 Ohio Op. 442, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 330

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 8, 1935

Docket25289

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 195 N.E. 867 (Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern, 195 N.E. 867, 129 Ohio St. 463, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463, 2 Ohio Op. 442, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 330 (Ohio 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed upon the unambiguous provisions of Sections 1465-31, 5611-1, 5611-2 and 5609, General Code, and upon the authority of State, ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, 128 Ohio St., 553, 192 N. E., 787; State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, 124 Ohio St., 269, 178 N. E., 258, 78 A. L. R., 1079, and State, ex rel. Tax Commission of Ohio, v. Faust, Aud., 113 Ohio St., 365, 149 N. E., 197.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed upon the unambiguous provisions of Sections 1465-31, 5611-1, 5611-2 and 5609, General Code, and upon the authority of State, ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, 128 Ohio St., 553, 192 N. E., 787; State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, 124 Ohio St., 269, 178 N. E., 258, 78 A. L. R., 1079, and State, ex rel. Tax Commission of Ohio, v. Faust, Aud., 113 Ohio St., 365, 149 N. E., 197.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 N.E. 867, 129 Ohio St. 463, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463, 2 Ohio Op. 442, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-ex-rel-methodist-book-concern-ohio-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack