Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern
Opinion
It is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed upon the unambiguous provisions of Sections 1465-31, 5611-1, 5611-2 and 5609, General Code, and upon the authority of State, ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, 128 Ohio St., 553, 192 N. E., 787; State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, 124 Ohio St., 269, 178 N. E., 258, 78 A. L. R., 1079, and State, ex rel. Tax Commission of Ohio, v. Faust, Aud., 113 Ohio St., 365, 149 N. E., 197.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
195 N.E. 867 (Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.