Bell v. State

535 So. 2d 212, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 680, 1988 WL 135255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1987 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5641
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 28, 1988·No. 5 Div. 300·Published

Opinion

TYSON, Judge.

Gary Lamar Bell was positively identified at trial as the perpetrator of the robbery of Domino’s Pizza, Lanett, Alabama, on July 15, 1985, by several State witnesses. Fingerprint identification was subse[213] quently matched. The shotgun used in the robbery was also recovered and identified. A mask was also recovered and identified.

In light of the very strong proof of first degree robbery, there is no merit to appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal.

In view of the above and the opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex Parte Bell, 535 So.2d 210 (Ala.1988), on the Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), question and our determinations herein, there is no merit whatsoever to either prong of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

After careful review of this record, this cause is due to be and the same is, hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 535 So. 2d 212, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 680, 1988 WL 135255 (Ala. Ct. App. 1988).

535 So. 2d 212 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Bell v. State
535 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)