Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Bell v. State

139 Ala. 124

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 139 Ala. 124 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 139 Ala. 124 (Ala. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWDELL, J. —

The defendant was indicted for embezzlement under section 4660 of the Code. A demurrer was interposed to the indictment and was overruled by the court. This action of the court is the only question presented for consideration. The first ground of the demurrer challenges the sufficiency of the indictment in that it charges “that the defendant did embezzle or fraudulently convert,” etc. The second ground challenges the sufficiency of the indictment because the word fraudulently is spelled fraudelently. Both grounds are wholly without merit, and the trial court committed no error in its ruling.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWDELL, J. —

The defendant was indicted for embezzlement under section 4660 of the Code. A demurrer was interposed to the indictment and was overruled by the court. This action of the court is the only question presented for consideration. The first ground of the demurrer challenges the sufficiency of the indictment in that it charges “that the defendant did embezzle or fraudulently convert,” etc. The second ground challenges the sufficiency of the indictment because the word fraudulently is spelled fraudelently. Both grounds are wholly without merit, and the trial court committed no error in its ruling.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 Ala. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-ala-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack