Bell v. Snyder

Supreme Court of Florida

Bell v. Snyder

778 So. 2d 970, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 58, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 59, 2001 WL 58454

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 2001

DocketNo. SC99-92

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 778 So. 2d 970 (Bell v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Snyder, 778 So. 2d 970, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 58, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 59, 2001 WL 58454 (Fla. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially granted review in Snyder v. Bell, 746 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), on the basis of an alleged express and direct conflict with this Court’s decision in Lohr v. Byrd, 522 So.2d 845 (Fla.1988), the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Berryhill, 620 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Vining v. Martyn, 660 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in McArthur Dairy, Inc. v. Original Kielbs, Inc., 481 [971]*971So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Upon further examination and review, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case without further review of the matter.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. SHAW and ANSTEAD, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially granted review in Snyder v. Bell, 746 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), on the basis of an alleged express and direct conflict with this Court’s decision in Lohr v. Byrd, 522 So.2d 845 (Fla.1988), the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Berryhill, 620 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Vining v. Martyn, 660 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in McArthur Dairy, Inc. v. Original Kielbs, Inc., 481 [971]*971So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Upon further examination and review, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case without further review of the matter.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. SHAW and ANSTEAD, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

778 So. 2d 970, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 58, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 59, 2001 WL 58454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-snyder-fla-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack