Bell v. Smith

138 S.E.2d 34, 262 N.C. 540, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 677
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 30, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If a defendant in a civil action is non compos mentis, he must defend by general or testamentary guardian if he has one within the State, otherwise by guardian ad litem to be appointed by the court. Hood v. Holding, 205 N.C. 451, 171 S.E. 633. The court may not quash the service on an incompetent, but should see to it that he is properly represented before any action is taken which is detrimental to his interests. Either party, or the court upon its own motion, may initiate proceedings for the appointment of a guardian ad litem before any hearing on the merits.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Smith, 138 S.E.2d 34, 262 N.C. 540, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 677 (N.C. 1964).

138 S.E.2d 34 (Bell v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutledge v. Rutledge
179 S.E.2d 163 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)