Bell v. Siwoff
12 A.2d 881, 124 N.J.L. 563, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 306
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, HAGUE, JJ. 9.
For reversal — PARKER, RAFFERTY, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. Siwoff, 12 A.2d 881, 124 N.J.L. 563, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 306 (N.J. 1940).
12 A.2d 881 (Bell v. Siwoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Borowski v. Meyers
72 A.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1994)