Bell v. Salkind
198 Misc. 613, 103 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2469
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 19, 1950
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 198 Misc. 613 (Bell v. Salkind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Salkind, 198 Misc. 613, 103 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).
Opinion
The complaint fails to state a cause of action. The order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs, and motion granted, with $10 costs to defendants.
Steinbbink, Pennelly and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McClellan Agency, Inc. v. Cunningham, Nielsen & Molloy, Inc.
22 Misc. 2d 372 (New York County Courts, 1960)
Storer v. Ripley
12 Misc. 2d 466 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Finger v. Roth Bros. Regal Restaurant Supply Corp.
2 Misc. 2d 944 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Ingber v. Weinbrot
198 Misc. 824 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
198 Misc. 613, 103 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-salkind-nyappterm-1950.