Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
188 So. 3d 93, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4870, 2016 WL 1239864
This text of 188 So. 3d 93 (Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., 188 So. 3d 93, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4870, 2016 WL 1239864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
The record before this Court does not establish that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Appellant Lawanda Jean Bell’s Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 motion to vacate a foreclosure judgment and foreclosure sale. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed. ■
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 So. 3d 93, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4870, 2016 WL 1239864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-reverse-mortgage-solutions-inc-fladistctapp-2016.