Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2016·No. 15-2369·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 30, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D15-2369

Lower Tribunal No. 13-12061

Lawanda Jean Bell,

Appellant,

vs.

Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lisa S. Walsh, Judge.

Law Offices of Matthew Troccoli, P.A., and Matthew Joseph Troccoli, for appellant.

McCalla Raymer LLC, and Kaivon Yasinian (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, ROTHENBERG and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The record before this Court does not establish that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Appellant Lawanda Jean Bell’s Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 motion to vacate a foreclosure judgment and foreclosure sale. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. (Bell v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)