Bell v. R. D. Wood & Co. ex rel. Camden Iron Works

181 Pa. 175
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 3, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 496·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A careful consideration of this record discloses no error in the decree of July 21,1896, or in the proceedings leading up thereto. The action of the court below in dissolving the preliminary injunction and dismissing the bill at the plaintiff’s costs is so fully vindicated in the clear and convincing opinion of the learned president of the 47th judicial district, who specially presided at the hearing, that nothing need be added thereto.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at plaintiffs’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. R. D. Wood & Co. ex rel. Camden Iron Works, 181 Pa. 175 (Pa. 1897).

181 Pa. 175 (Bell v. R. D. Wood & Co. ex rel. Camden Iron Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oppenheimer v. Bland
10 Pa. D. & C.2d 247 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1956)
Ivey v. Housing Foundation of America, Inc.
73 F. Supp. 201 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1947)
McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.
143 A. 574 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Best v. Blue Ridge Water Supply Co.
7 Pa. D. & C. 549 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Hogsett v. Thompson
101 A. 941 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Brothers v. Girard National Bank
93 A. 940 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Cronan v. District Court
96 P. 768 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1908)
Margo v. Pennsylvania Railroad
62 A. 1081 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)