Bell v. Proctor

92 S.E.2d 807, 93 Ga. App. 816, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. Proctor. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Ga. App. 759
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 3, 1956·No. 35842·Published

Opinion

Gardner, P. J.

The Supreme Court, in. Bell v. Proctor, 212 Ga. 325 (92 S. E. 2d 514), having reversed the judgment of this court in Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759 (90 S. E. 2d 84), wherein this court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Emanuel County, and having reversed the rulings in the opinion of this court in that case, and ruled that the trial court erred in failing to charge as to the interest or want of in[817] terest of witnesses when charging the provisions of Code § 38-107, the former judgment of this court of affirmance is hereby vacated and the judgment of the superior court is hereby

Decided May 3, 1956. Homer S. Durden, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Price, Spivey & Carlton, contra.

Reversed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Proctor, 92 S.E.2d 807, 93 Ga. App. 816, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 872 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

92 S.E.2d 807 (Bell v. Proctor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. Proctor
90 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Bell v. Proctor
92 S.E.2d 514 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)