Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bell v. Proctor

Bell v. Proctor

92 S.E.2d 807, 93 Ga. App. 816, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 872
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 3, 1956
Docket35842
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E.2d 807 (Bell v. Proctor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Proctor, 92 S.E.2d 807, 93 Ga. App. 816, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 872 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Gardner, P. J.

The Supreme Court, in. Bell v. Proctor, 212 Ga. 325 (92 S. E. 2d 514), having reversed the judgment of this court in Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759 (90 S. E. 2d 84), wherein this court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Emanuel County, and having reversed the rulings in the opinion of this court in that case, and ruled that the trial court erred in failing to charge as to the interest or want of in[817]*817terest of witnesses when charging the provisions of Code § 38-107, the former judgment of this court of affirmance is hereby vacated and the judgment of the superior court is hereby

Decided May 3, 1956. Homer S. Durden, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Price, Spivey & Carlton, contra.

Reversed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Proctor
90 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Bell v. Proctor
92 S.E.2d 514 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E.2d 807, 93 Ga. App. 816, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-proctor-gactapp-1956.