Bell v. Pokrass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bell v. Pokrass

49 A.D.2d 735, 373 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10689

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1975·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 2, 1975, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The temporary injunction was properly denied, plaintiffs not having shown a clear right to the relief requested. Moreover, since in any event the Chase Manhattan Bank may not be prevented from selling the subject stock to a third party, the relief sought by plaintiffs is of no avail. And finally, it appears that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Tilzer, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 2, 1975, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The temporary injunction was properly denied, plaintiffs not having shown a clear right to the relief requested. Moreover, since in any event the Chase Manhattan Bank may not be prevented from selling the subject stock to a third party, the relief sought by plaintiffs is of no avail. And finally, it appears that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Tilzer, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Bell v. Pokrass, 49 A.D.2d 735, 373 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

49 A.D.2d 735 (Bell v. Pokrass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.