Bell v. Phillips

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Bell v. Phillips

3 F. Cas. 119

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. Cas. 119 (Bell v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Phillips, 3 F. Cas. 119 (circtsdoh 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Patents for Inventions — Action for Infringement — Measure of Damages.

Where a patent was for heating boilers with the waste heat of a blast furnace, held, in the case of an infringement by the use of a machine which was the same in principle, that the rule of damages was the price of the coal saved by the use of the improvement.

[NOTE. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible. Statement of the point determined was taken from Law’s Pat. Dig. 240. For other cases involving this patent, see Bell v. Daniels, Case No. 1,247, and Bell v. McCollough, Case No. 1,256.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patents for Inventions — Action for Infringement — Measure of Damages.

Where a patent was for heating boilers with the waste heat of a blast furnace, held, in the case of an infringement by the use of a machine which was the same in principle, that the rule of damages was the price of the coal saved by the use of the improvement.

[NOTE. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible. Statement of the point determined was taken from Law’s Pat. Dig. 240. For other cases involving this patent, see Bell v. Daniels, Case No. 1,247, and Bell v. McCollough, Case No. 1,256.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. Cas. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-phillips-circtsdoh-1858.