Bell v. Paquet
This text of 129 P. 757 (Bell v. Paquet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[163]*163Opinion
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Exceptions are taken to the refusal of various instructions requested by defendant. We have carefully examined the testimony in the case and the instructions requested, and are of the opinion that, taken as a whole, the instructions given fairly cover the issues, and that the giving of the instructions requested would not have affected the verdict, and should not have affected it.
No new questions of law are involved, and in accordance with Article VII, Section 3, of the constitution, as amended November 8, 1910 (Laws of 1911, p. 7), the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 P. 757, 64 Or. 162, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-paquet-or-1913.