Bell v. Owen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Bell v. Owen

8 Ala. 312

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 Ala. 312 (Bell v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Owen, 8 Ala. 312 (Ala. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

1. The decisions recently made by us, in the cases of Robinson v. Garth, 6 Ala. Rep. 204, and Lamkin v. Crawford, at this term, show that the action is properly brought in the name of the sheriff.

2. We are not aware that there is any material distinction between the mode of declaring for the breach of a contract of sale, whether the subject matter of the contract is real or personal property. Although with respect to the former, the contract cannot be enforced unless it is in writing, signed by the party to be charged therewith, yet it is not necessary to aver, that it was so, in the pleadings. With respect to the form of the counts, in this case, they seem to be substantially the same as the more general one in Lamkin v. Crawford, and under the authority of that case, we consider them as good.

The consequence is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

1. The decisions recently made by us, in the cases of Robinson v. Garth, 6 Ala. Rep. 204, and Lamkin v. Crawford, at this term, show that the action is properly brought in the name of the sheriff.

2. We are not aware that there is any material distinction between the mode of declaring for the breach of a contract of sale, whether the subject matter of the contract is real or personal property. Although with respect to the former, the contract cannot be enforced unless it is in writing, signed by the party to be charged therewith, yet it is not necessary to aver, that it was so, in the pleadings. With respect to the form of the counts, in this case, they seem to be substantially the same as the more general one in Lamkin v. Crawford, and under the authority of that case, we consider them as good.

The consequence is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ala. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-owen-ala-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack