Home/New York Court of Appeals/Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.

Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.

564 N.E.2d 664, 76 N.Y.2d 930, 563 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 3290
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1990·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cross motion for imposition of sanctions granted (see, 22 NYCRR part 130). This is the fifth motion in a chain reflecting a strategy of dilatory, frivolous avoidance of a 20-year-old student loan debt for two years’ law school education. The abuse of the judicial process and the imposition on opposition parties, aggravated by movant’s failure to pay usual motion costs imposed by this Court on previous applications to this Court, amply justify the imposition of sanctions in the sum of $1,000 pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp., 564 N.E.2d 664, 76 N.Y.2d 930, 563 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 3290 (N.Y. 1990).

564 N.E.2d 664 (Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
751 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Levy v. Carol Management Corp.
260 A.D.2d 27 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Jemzura v. Mugglin
207 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Feldstein v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs
804 F. Supp. 471 (E.D. New York, 1992)
Jason v. Chusid
78 N.Y.2d 1099 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)