Bell v. N.D. Department of Transportation
Opinion
Filed 5/17/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2012 ND 96
W.J. Wilson, Jr., Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Nos. 20110362 & 20110363
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Bobbi Brown Weiler, 418 E. Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant.
Kelly Ann Dillon, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee.
Wilson v. State
[¶1] W.J. Wilson, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Wilson argues he was denied due process of law because the court did not view an allegedly altered videotape at the hearing on his post-conviction relief application. Wilson also contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to call and question a certain witness. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 ND 102 (Bell v. N.D. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.