Bell v. National Collection System

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Bell v. National Collection System

1954 OK 123, 269 P.2d 992, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 504

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 27, 1954

DocketNo. 36008

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1954 OK 123 (Bell v. National Collection System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. National Collection System, 1954 OK 123, 269 P.2d 992, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 504 (Okla. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

ARNOLD, Justice.

Plaintiff, a special officer serving process and other legal papers out of the court of A. W. Van Zandt, Justice of the Peace, District No. 9, Tulsa County, brought this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County against defendants for unpaid balance of fees due her in serving process in numerous cases filed by defendants as plaintiffs in said Justice of the Peace Court. Separate demurrers of defendants to plaintiff’s petition were sustained by the court and exceptions allowed. Plaintiff elected to stand on her petition, the court made an order dismissing her cause of action, and plaintiff has brought this appeal.

As stated by plaintiff in error, this is a companion case to and the same legal questions are involved in Kerr, Adm’x, v. United Collection Service, Okl.Sup., 267 P.2d 611, opinion by Johnson, V. C. J. The opinion in that case is hereby adopted as the opinion in this case.

Affirmed.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, ARNOLD, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. WILLIAMS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARNOLD, Justice.

Plaintiff, a special officer serving process and other legal papers out of the court of A. W. Van Zandt, Justice of the Peace, District No. 9, Tulsa County, brought this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County against defendants for unpaid balance of fees due her in serving process in numerous cases filed by defendants as plaintiffs in said Justice of the Peace Court. Separate demurrers of defendants to plaintiff’s petition were sustained by the court and exceptions allowed. Plaintiff elected to stand on her petition, the court made an order dismissing her cause of action, and plaintiff has brought this appeal.

As stated by plaintiff in error, this is a companion case to and the same legal questions are involved in Kerr, Adm’x, v. United Collection Service, Okl.Sup., 267 P.2d 611, opinion by Johnson, V. C. J. The opinion in that case is hereby adopted as the opinion in this case.

Affirmed.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, ARNOLD, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. WILLIAMS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1954 OK 123, 269 P.2d 992, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-national-collection-system-okla-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack