Bell v. National Bank of Commerce

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bell v. National Bank of Commerce

129 S.W.2d 1215, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1194

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 14, 1939

DocketNo. 10603

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.W.2d 1215 (Bell v. National Bank of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. National Bank of Commerce, 129 S.W.2d 1215, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1194 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, Chief Justice.

In this case neither party has filed briefs, but appellee has filed motion that judgment be affirmed.

In the absence of briefs, this Court may, in its discretion, dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, or go into the record to determine if fundamental error lurks therein, and, if not, to affirm; but if error is apparent, to reverse. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

We have inspected the record and perceive no error.

The motion is granted and the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI